logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.05.16 2018고정323
문화재보호법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a national cultural heritage protection zone C company D in Yangsan City B, which is designated as a national cultural heritage protection zone.

In order to change the current state of cultural heritage protection zones designated by the State, permission shall be obtained from the Administrator of the Cultural Heritage Administration, as prescribed by Presidential Decree.

Nevertheless, from May 2017 to June 2017, the Defendant extended the road by expanding the access road of 100 meters in length to 3 meters in width without permission from the Administrator of the Cultural Heritage Administration, which is the competent administrative agency, and then packaging the road with concrete.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written accusation of E;

1. A report on investigation (on-site inspection and attachment of site photographs);

1. Application of the statutes governing the preservation and management of cultural heritage;

1. Article 99 (1) 1 of the Protection of Cultural Properties Act and Article 35 (1) 1 of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense and the selection of a fine for negligence;

1. The main sentence of Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (the main sentence of Article 62 (1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (the recovery from the original state on May 3, 2018, such as the fact that the defendant is the first offender, the removal of the concrete packaging indicated in the judgment, the planting of 500 standing trees, etc.) is notified of the completion of recovery from the Yangsan market on May 3, 2018, the fact that the defendant reflects the fact that the defendant caused the instant

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse (in cases where a sentence of suspension of execution becomes void and revoked and a fine is not paid)

arrow