1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. Judgment on the assertion on damage to property

A. The summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion is as follows: (a) the Defendants jointly and severally liable for the Plaintiff’s damages on the property of KRW 116,164,896, 200, and around 08:0 on September 19, 2012, and around 00 on September 20, 2012, 200, Plaintiff 20 years, 1,248, 25 years, 37, 130, 130, 130, 1300, 137, 200, 116, 164,896, 137, 200, 116, and 137,000, respectively.

B. Even according to the testimony of the witness E applied by the Plaintiff, when the Plaintiff developed the dry field owned by the F Agricultural Association Corporation (FTK) and the trees were planted in that dry field from its original date. The Plaintiff also recognized that the Plaintiff leased and used the dry field without compensation from FF Agricultural Association. Other evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize that the trees of the Plaintiff’s assertion are owned by the Plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise.

The Plaintiff is the owner of trees, and even if the Defendants jointly cut trees ( there is insufficient evidence to acknowledge that the Defendant C felled trees), the Plaintiff prepared a letter of request on September 24, 2012 by moving all crops and ground cultivated on the land owned by the F Agricultural Association on the land owned by the F Agricultural Association (No. 4-2, the Plaintiff asserted that it was forged, but there is no evidence to acknowledge it; rather, in a forged criminal case, the Plaintiff stated that he had granted his seal to the Defendant C to prepare it), and (2) on November 25, 2014, the Plaintiff did not raise any objection despite being aware of the cutting of trees.