1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion was that the Defendant laid down a 700 best tree owned by the Plaintiff without permission. As such, the Plaintiff sought compensation for damages from the Defendant for the payment of KRW 30,000,100, which is the interest that was able to obtain from the two best tree or the interest that was able to obtain from the Defendant

2. In light of the fact that there is no dispute between the parties to the judgment, the entries in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including each number), and the purport of the entire pleadings as a result of appraiser C’s appraisal, it is recognized that the defendant arbitrarily laid down 225 shares of the 225 shares that were planted in the Gongju-si, Gongju-si, the Plaintiff owned (no evidence exists to prove that the Haak tree exceeded 225 shares). Accordingly, the defendant is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for damages suffered by the Plaintiff by arbitrarily cutting the Haak trees.

However, according to the appraiser C's appraisal result and the purport of the whole pleadings, the market price of the two pine trees is calculated by deducting the production cost from the produced pine value. If the price of the two pine trees 225 is 59,040 won and the production cost is deducted, the market price of the two pine trees is recognized as the cause of 0.

According to the above facts of recognition, it is difficult to view that the Plaintiff suffered any property loss in relation to the value of the above two pine trees or the profits that the Plaintiff could have gained through the above two pine trees.

On the other hand, the Plaintiff did not prove other damages caused by the felling trees.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.