1. Defendant C: (a) KRW 4,106,646 for the Plaintiff; and (b) KRW 1,000,000 for each of the Defendants B and each of them, from July 25, 2014 to January 12, 2016.

1. Judgment on the assertion on damage to property

A. The Defendants asserted by the Plaintiff jointly suffered property damage of KRW 16,164,896, inasmuch as the Plaintiff’s 20-years 20-years 1,248-years 25-years 37, 130-years 130, 200-years 14:00 on September 19, 2012 and around 08:0 on September 20, 2012, from the Plaintiff’s 20-years 1,248-years 37, 25-years 25-years 130,00, 13-years 20-years 116,164,896.

B. Even based on the testimony of the witness E applied by the Plaintiff, when the Plaintiff developed the dry field owned by the F Agricultural Association Corporation (FTTKD), trees were planted in the original dry field. Since the Plaintiff asserted that the dry field was leased and used without compensation from FF farming association, it is insufficient to recognize that the trees claimed by the Plaintiff are owned by the Plaintiff.

The Plaintiff is the owner of trees, and even if the Defendants jointly cut trees (at least evidence to acknowledge that Defendant C felled with trees), the Plaintiff prepared a letter of request by the △△△ on September 24, 2012 by moving all crops and ground resources cultivated by the F Agricultural Partnership on the land owned by the Plaintiff (at least 4-2, the Plaintiff asserted that it was forged, but there is no evidence to acknowledge it; rather, in a forged criminal case, the Plaintiff stated that he had a seal affixed to Defendant C to prepare it), and the Plaintiff did not raise any objection despite being aware that he felled of the cutting of the △△△ tree (at the Plaintiff’s written request on November 25, 2014, the Plaintiff stated that Defendant B would cut down trees and use them for the treatment of the Plaintiff at any time, and that he would be able to recognize the Plaintiff’s remaining 1 through 37, etc., in light of the following facts: