1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a Chinese national residing in the area north of the Military Demarcation Line (hereinafter “North Korea”). On April 25, 2004, the Plaintiff is a company that runs the current events and Internet newspaper service business.

B. From January 29, 2018 to January 31, 2018, the Defendant published the following articles via the Defendant’s Internet site (C) (hereinafter “each of the instant articles”) (hereinafter “each of the instant articles”); and, when individually named, “the instant articles 1, 2, 3, and 4 articles” according to the sequences.

On January 29, 2018, when the Korea National Intelligence Service was pointed out as a problem of the anti-public investigation and counter-defense affairs on January 29, 2018, a counter-espionage case of the E-city public officials of the North China of China of 2013.

At the time, the provision of the instant case was in Category A.

He/she was the North Korean defectors of Chinese nationality, but entered the country as the North Korean defectors, and entered the country as the contracting officer in E, and made a list of North Korean defectors in Korea and delivered them to North Korea without permission through China, he/she was suffering from the death of the NIS.

The problem was that the content of the AC's entry into China and North Korea presented in the trial process was not issued by the Chinese government.

2. On January 29, 2018, 2018, a espionage case of FE public official was suspected of hiding the North Korean nationality of the People's Republic of Korea, even though the People's Republic of Korea escaped from the F E in 2004, the People's Republic of Korea was hidden and settled in the Republic of Korea and receiving benefits from the State to settle in the Republic of Korea, and North Korean People's Republic of Korea was exposed to the suspicion that he/she engaged in a job espionage activity as a public official when he/she was employed.

3. On January 29, 2018, the issue was due to the controversy over the evidence of the NIS in the Sponsing case of the Sponsing public officials of EE City (2014).

In the case of E, the court is not guilty of A who reads North Korea as a public official, and delivered the list of North Korean defectors to North Korea.