beta
Text
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car at Dbenz.
Around 01:40 on August 6, 2014, the Defendant driven the above vehicle, and led the Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul bypassing the front way from the scar on the side of the singing club to the south-do string in an influorous speed.
At night, since a house is very narrow to the road width on the backway, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately operating the steering gear in the driver of the vehicle, and driving the steering system in the front direction and by properly examining the road situation in the front direction.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, while neglecting the right and right and right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right
2. On the grounds delineated below, the lower court determined that the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) among the facts charged constituted a case where there is no proof of crime, and dismissed the prosecution on the ground that the Defendant subscribed to the comprehensive
① The location of the accident seems to have been difficult for the Defendant to feel that the part of the Defendant’s vehicle’s right lower than the Defendant’s back wheel, lids, and studs, etc. was not flat due to the front side of the house, and that the part of the Defendant’s vehicle’s right lower than the ground fell, and thus, it was difficult for the Defendant to feel that the part of the Defendant’s vehicle was issued with the rear wheels.
② The Defendant did not escape at a rapid speed after the accident, and continued driving at a normal speed.
(3) A witness F and G shall be the time when a victim F is involved.