logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2014.01.09 2013고정150
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. On September 12, 2012, the Defendant, at around 16:20 on September 12, 2012, driven a C Poter freight vehicle and got the Defendant to proceed with the road if there is no car in front of the So-gu So-dong So-dong, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-do.

Since the place is where people have frequent access to a road without a vehicle line, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to check and drive the way by checking well the right and the right of the road at all times.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and caused the victim to go beyond the road by driving the new-exploiter machine, which was cited by the victim D(13 years of age, south) who was standing on the left side of the road in the direction of proceeding, by driving it on the left side of the vehicle.

Ultimately, even though the Defendant suffered from an injury to the left-hand elbow in need of treatment for about two weeks due to the above occupational negligence, the Defendant immediately stopped and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as aiding the victim.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court, the following facts can be acknowledged. A) The instant accident site is large and small side roads, and the vehicle parked on both sides of the road is large, and the traffic of people and vehicles is frequent during the instant accident time zone.

B. D was walking along the direction of the road between the vehicles parked on the left side of the instant vehicle immediately before the instant accident, and the Defendant driven the instant cargo and went through the road adjacent to the road where D had D walked. For any reason, D left the string part of the instant truck, which D was able to walk on the left side of the Defendant’s vehicle.

However, the body of D.

arrow