The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is a person engaging in driving a vehicle BM5.

On September 27, 2019, the Defendant driven the said car at a speed of 20 km per hour from the surface of the D apartment zone to the front intersection of the D apartment zone in order to drive the said car at a speed of 14:30 meters.

There is no center line, and there is a place that is different from pedestrians on a side-road, so it was a duty of care to reduce the speed in advance to those engaged in driving service, and to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the steering gear.

Nevertheless, even though the Defendant neglected to stop the victim E (the age of 65) at the front bank, the Defendant left the left side of the victim's bridge from the left side of the running direction of the Madle Motor Vehicle to the right side.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence, such as the 2nd and the 3nd and the 8th anniversary of the right-hand side, which requires eight weeks of treatment.

2. Determination

(a) Crimes of non-compliance with intent: The main sentence of Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents;

B. A written agreement stating the victim's expression of intention not to punish the victim after the indictment of this case was filed.

(c) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;