1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Basic Facts

The pertinent Plaintiff of the parties (hereinafter referred to as the “E”), F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “F”), G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “G”), and J Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “J”), was the chairperson of the H Group affiliate.

Defendant D was the representative director of K Co., Ltd. established for the purpose of rental car business.

Defendant C has served as an assistant officer of Defendant B, who was a member of the National Assembly from around 2008 to January 2012.

From September 2009 to November 2009, Defendant D received the Plaintiff’s request from the Plaintiff that “H group is under investigation by prosecution” and “E is under investigation by prosecution.” From December 2009 to December 2009, it continued to receive “E is forced by the Korea Development Bank and is under detention.”

On November 16, 2009, Defendant D received KRW 780 million in total from November 16, 2009 to June 201, 201, upon receiving a request from the Plaintiff to make a solicitation from the prosecution public officials for the H Group under investigation by the Plaintiff, and received KRW 100,000,000 from the Plaintiff from November 16, 2009 to June 201, for the investigation by the prosecution against H Group and the workshop program by the Korea Development Bank for E.

In addition, the defendant D received from the plaintiff around December 2009, one male straws equivalent to the market price of 10 million won, upon receiving a request from the plaintiff to the above purport.

Defendant C’s solicitation and delivery of money and valuables to Defendant C received a solicitation from around October 2009 to August 201, 201 from the Plaintiff and Defendant D to the effect that Defendant C would be free to investigate the origin of the H Group from the Plaintiff and Defendant D, and that the workout program against E and F could be conducted in favor of the Plaintiff.

In return for the above solicitation, Defendant C’s above solicitation: (a) the police officer of December 2009 to the Haman of January 201, 201; (b) cash of KRW 300 million to the Haman of January 2010; (c) cash of KRW 100 million from June 201 to July 201; and (d) the year 2010.