logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2019.08.14 2019가단8406
대여금
Text

1. Defendant B’s KRW 20,000,000 as well as 15% per annum from April 10, 2019 to May 31, 2019, respectively, to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. From December 23, 2013 to October 6, 2017, the Plaintiff transferred KRW 28,850,000 in total to the deposit account in the name of Defendant B, KRW 28,850,000 in the name of Defendant C, and KRW 39,50,000 in total to the deposit account in the name of Defendant C, on three occasions from August 4, 2016 to March 26, 2018, respectively.

B. From May 7, 2014 to February 6, 2017, the Plaintiff received each remittance of KRW 8,850,000,00 in total from Defendant B’s account over 11 times, and KRW 7,970,00 in total from Defendant D’s account from December 5, 2016 to November 9, 2018.

C. Upon the Plaintiff’s request on May 2018, Defendant B prepared and delivered to the Plaintiff a payment note promising to pay KRW 5,500,000 to the Plaintiff one million per month until June 27, 2018.

Defendant C’s husband and wife, and Defendant D’s children.

[Reasons for Recognition] Evidence No. 1-20, Evidence No. 1-1-20, Evidence No. 1-2, and the purport of the whole pleading

2. Judgment on the parties' arguments

A. The gist of the assertion 1) Upon the request of the Plaintiff B, the Plaintiff lent the sum of KRW 28,850,000 to the Defendant B, and around the beginning of August 2016, Defendant D lent the sum of KRW 30,000,000 to the Defendant D upon the request of the Defendant D to pay KRW 39,50,000,000 to the Defendant D, and around May 22, 2017, Defendant C lent the sum of KRW 5,000,000 to the Defendant C with the intent to pay KRW 5,00,000,000,000 to the Defendant C, with the belief that the Defendant C would pay its horse, and Defendant C would not have any duty to borrow KRW 8,850,00,00, Defendant D’s credit and KRW 7,97,000,00, Defendant C was not aware of each of the Plaintiff’s deposit passbook.

(b).

arrow