logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2013.08.28 2012고정1649
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Doing Vehicles) and the Road Traffic Act (Non-accidenting Measures) are those who are engaged in driving service of EXE motor vehicles;

On December 22, 2011, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on December 22:10, 201, and driven two-lanes in two-lanes in the original valley of a member city in Ansan-si in Gyeonggi-si, the Defendant driven the two-lanes in the direction of the third-lane in the direction of the oil station in the middle school located in the middle school located in Busan-si.

In that case, the driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to accurately operate the steering system, brakes and other devices of the motor vehicle, and to refrain from operating the motor vehicle at a speed or in a manner that may cause danger and harm to others according to the road traffic situation and the structure and performance of the motor vehicle.

However, the defendant neglected to do so and makes it difficult for the defendant to stop.

The lower part of the victim C(47 years of age, inn)'s DKaman vehicle volume which was stopped for signalling in front of the same lane was received as the front part of the vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the victim’s bodily damage equivalent to KRW 401,390 in the estimate of the repair cost of the damaged vehicle at the same time, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment due to the above occupational negligence.

If the driver of the vehicle causes an accident, the driver of the vehicle immediately stops and takes necessary measures such as aiding the injured, but the defendant escaped without any measure.

2. A holder of an automobile in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall not operate on the road any vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance;

However, the Defendant, like the foregoing “A”, operated the car volume of B EXE car not covered by mandatory insurance on the road.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the police interrogation protocol against the defendant 1.C

1. An inquiry into the enemy (B);

1. A medical certificate (C);

1. Written estimates (D) legislation.

arrow