logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2013.03.14 2013고단56
보건범죄단속에관한특별조치법위반(부정의료업자)
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a year and a fine of 3,00,000 won; and

2. The defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, who is not a doctor, was engaged in the following medical practice for profit.

1. On April 15, 201, April 30, 2011, and May 15, 2015, 201, the Defendant: (a) carried out a scambling procedure by inserting the face of E from the house of Mayang-gu, Mayang-gu, 202, 202, and 202, into the chest and her chests; and (b) received KRW 4,00,000 from E in return.

2. On April 30, 201, May 15, 2011, and June 12, 2013, 201, the Defendant, at the above D’s house, inserted a cryptomer procedure into F’s face and carried out a cryptomer procedure, and received KRW 1,800,000 from F in return.

3. On May 15, 201, the Defendant, at the above D’s house, performed a one-time writing procedure by inserting scams into G’s face by inserting scams into G’s face, and received KRW 1,800,000 from G in return.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statements consistent with the accused in the first trial records;

1. Examination of suspect suspect regarding D by the prosecution;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statements of E, F and G;

1. Article 5 subparagraph 1 of the Act on Special Measures for the Control of Public Health Crimes (Article 5 of the Act on Special Measures for the Control of Public Health Crimes, Article 27 (1) of the Medical Service Act (Selection of Imprisonment and Imposition of Fine concurrently);

2. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 and 6 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

3. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.

4. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years and a fine of one million won for the same crime at the Seoul Eastern District Court on March 18, 199, and on May 15, 2009, in the same crime in the Suwon District Court's Ansan Branch, the defendant had been sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years and a fine of three million won for the same crime. However, even if the defendant had been sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years and a fine of three million won for the same crime, he again repeats the pertinent unauthorized medical practice before the expiration of the suspended sentence period and the victims have complained of side effects caused by the defendant'

arrow