The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant was assaulted first by the victim at the time of the appeal. However, the Defendant could not have any physical contact with the victim on the wind that employees at the time of the appeal did not have any physical contact with the victim because the Defendant lost cop, thereby getting out his breath.

Nevertheless, the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case. The court below erred by misunderstanding facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, i.e., ① the victim made a consistent statement from the investigative agency to the court of the court below that he had first been faced with the defendant's face at the time of drinking. The victim's side of the assault alleged by the victim coincides with the part of the victim's body, ② the defendant showed that he had been drinking to the victim, and later he had been faced with the victim's appearance, ② the defendant was accurately informed of the fact that he had been drinking to the victim, ③ how he had been a meal, ③ how he was aware, and ③ how he was her at the time of the victim, ③ it was difficult for the defendant to make a statement, but it was difficult for the victim to concretely and how he was her at the time when she was faced with each other, but it was not clear that the defendant made a statement that he had been aware of the victim's physical contact with the victim after considering the fact that he had been aware of the victim's appearance.