A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the driver of the vehicle BM5 vehicle.

On August 19, 2018, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 17:35, while driving the vehicle at around 17:35, the Defendant proceeded one lane from the king elementary school to the 1-lane public announcement of the net Dom of 94.

No driver of any motor vehicle, etc. shall threaten or endanger any other person, or drive any motor vehicle repeatedly or repeatedly, by committing any violation of signal instructions, violation of speed prohibition, crossing, internship, or backward prohibition, violation of safe distance, violation of prohibition of change of course, violation of prohibition of speed change, violation of prohibition of speeding, forward or passing, violation of prohibition of interference with noise that has no justifiable reason, or by committing two or more acts of noise that has no justifiable reason, or by continuing or causing any danger to traffic.

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the central line to overtake a numberless passenger vehicle; (b) driven by a number of vehicles on the opposite road; (c) continued to run along the bus after the bus side of the front bank; and (d) continued to run along the central line while passing the bus, the front part of the bus was received as the right side of the SM5 vehicle.

As a result, the defendant continued to commit the central crime, thereby threatening or endangering others or causing danger to traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on black stuffs;

1. Relevant legal provisions and Articles 151-2, 46-3 and 46-3 of the Road Traffic Act selective for criminal facts;

1. The sentence shall be determined as ordered by comprehensively taking into account various circumstances indicated in the pleadings of this case, such as the fact that there is no criminal record of imprisonment without prison labor or heavier punishment for the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, the fact that the sentence is not imposed, the depth reflects the Defendant’s age, sex, family relationship, environment, circumstances and result of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime.