logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.08.23 2018고정398
도로교통법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a driver of the B Benz S350 Blves car owned by himself.

On December 22, 2017, the Defendant came to proceed at approximately 30-40km/h speed, depending on the three-lane road in the direction of the flow of the administration in the direction of the administration in the basin, when the Defendant used the road of the bus stops in front of the apartment complex C, the location of the vehicle in Yongsan-si on December 22, 2017, at the speed of about 30-40km.

No driver of any motor vehicle, etc. shall threaten or endanger any other person, or drive any motor vehicle repeatedly or repeatedly, by committing any violation of signal instructions, violation of speed prohibition, crossing, internship, or backward prohibition, violation of safe distance, violation of prohibition of change of course, violation of prohibition of speed change, violation of prohibition of speeding, forward or passing, violation of prohibition of interference with noise that has no justifiable reason, or by committing two or more acts of noise that has no justifiable reason, or by continuing or causing any danger to traffic.

Nevertheless, the defendant, who is not the defendant, stops in the same direction four-lanes of the E-V No. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F., which is driven by the victim D (59 S.) and left in the same direction, and tried to overtake the damaged vehicle by changing the damaged vehicle into a two-lane left left side, and re-enters the damaged vehicle into a rapid dust in the front of the damaged vehicle that was driven by avoiding the vehicle of the defendant, and changing the course to the right side, and the first facts charged of this part of the facts charged are recognized as not having interfered with the defendant's exercise of his/her right to defense (it does not affect the establishment of the crime unless the defendant operated one time before the damaged vehicle and changed to a rapid dust). It is modified as follows:

This led to the change of course to the left-hand side, and led to a sudden change to the future of the damaged vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Urban bus booms.

arrow