logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2020.10.23 2020고단1647
공무집행방해
Text

A fine of three million won shall be imposed on a defendant.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around 04:30 on June 29, 2020, the Defendant visited the Jeju Western Police Station Cown, which was the issue of payment of taxi expenses, and then visited the Jeju Western Police Station C police box located in B at Jeju. Accordingly, the Defendant was able to avoid any disturbance, such as her singinging, “I sing. I s. I s. I s. I s. I s. I s. I s. I s. I s. I s. I s. I s. I s. I s. I s. I s. I s. the case was received by E in the circumstances where the said police box was affiliated with the above police box. I s. I am s. I s. I s. I am on the floor, "I s. s. I s. I s. I s. I s. I s. I s. I s.D., thereby obstructing the police officer’s legitimate execution of criminal investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the defendant in this court;

1. Partial statement of the suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant prepared by the police;

1. Entry of each statement of the police officer D and F in the statement; and

1. Application of each investigation report (including attached documents) on police preparation, each statement of video (including confirmation of CCTV images recorded in a / C police box, such as field situation and refusal to affix seals) and statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. 【The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (amended by Act No. 334(1) of the Provisional Payment Order 【The scope of the sentence to be sentenced by a fine of KRW 50,000 or KRW 10 million) : Violence against police officials is deemed to be an unjustifiable challenge against the State’s public authority; the Defendant committed a direct assault on the body of a police officer who suffered damage; the Defendant committed a direct assault on the body of a police officer who suffered damage; and the Defendant was unable to use the police officer from the damaged police officer: The Defendant appears to have recognized and divided his mistake; and the Defendant is drunk.

arrow