Text
1. The defendant's protocol of mediation of the case 2007Kacheon Branch of Gwangju District Court 29056, 39053 (Joint) against the plaintiff is written.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On April 19, 2006, the Defendant: (a) on April 19, 2006, KRW 257 square meters of C forest land (hereinafter “D”); and (b) on April 19, 2006, the said forest land is the “land before the instant partition.”
(2) Of the above, the Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to shares in the name of 496/2,570. 2) The Defendant, from around 2006 to around 2006, resides in the building in E (hereinafter “Defendant’s Housing”) and the Plaintiff resides in F from around 2007 to the present date in the building (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s Housing”) respectively, and the said land is adjoining to the land prior to the instant partition.
3) On March 3, 2009, the land prior to the instant partition is 25 square meters of C forest land (hereinafter “first land”).
(A) G forest land 29 square meters (hereinafter “second land”)
A) Before the division, H Forest land is 203 square meters (hereinafter “third land”).
2) On September 10, 2007, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit claiming that “the amount calculated at the rate of KRW 500,000 per month from April 18, 2007 to the date the delivery of the said land is completed” against the Plaintiff by asserting that the Plaintiff occupied and used the land before the instant partition as the site of the Plaintiff’s housing, as the Busan District Court 2007Gau29056, Sept. 107.
2) On December 27, 2007, the Defendant filed a lawsuit claiming payment of KRW 14,000,000 and damages for delay from the day following the delivery date of a copy of the complaint to the day of complete payment, claiming that the Plaintiff damaged the reputation of the Defendant working at the above elementary school by pointing out false facts on the website of the International Elementary School and the J District Office of Education. 3) In the case of the Gwangju District Court 2007Gau29056, 2007Gau39053 (combined), the conciliation was established on April 23, 2008 between the Defendant and the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff, and the protocol under the following contents is 1. The Defendant filed a lawsuit with the Plaintiff by December 31, 2008.