1. On December 6, 2012, the National Labor Relations Commission rendered relief for unfair dismissal between the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s Intervenor.

1. Details of the Plaintiff’s project following the retrial decision;

C. The grounds for disciplinary action on February 3, 2009 (hereinafter “instant removal”) on May 4, 2012, including the date of the disciplinary action taken by the head of the Employment and Management Planning Team on February 3, 2009 on the part of the Intervenor joining the government-invested institution affiliated with the Ministry of Health and Welfare (hereinafter “ Intervenor”) (hereinafter “instant removal”). (1) The increase in annual salary through calculation of unfair career (2) the private use of the public vehicle. (3) The improper use of the public vehicle. (4) The improper use of the public vehicle. (5) The improper use of the corporate card management. (4) The improper use of the corporate card management. (4) The improper use of the corporate card management. (7) The improper use of the information system system 8 interference with the organization and operation of prisoners of war (hereinafter “instant misconduct.” In order to refer individually to “the instant wrongful act.” (hereinafter “instant disposition”). The reasons and reasons for the application for remedy by the Intervenor to the original inquiry court 1, 2009>

2. Whether the decision on the retrial of this case is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The Plaintiff’s allegation that the act of misconduct in the instant case was conducted by giving weight to the head of the department and the officer’s salary experience during the period of employment of the employees in the administrative position, and based on the calculation of the salary class. The Intervenor issued unjust orders to lower the subordinate employees to directly release the past experience of the head of the E-Management Planning Office, who is himself/herself and his/her superior, and received excessive remuneration for the past experience.

B. (2) The intervenor involved in the act of misconduct is absent from office without permission.