beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of the lawsuit, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. The grounds for disciplinary action on June 12, 2003, including the date disciplinary action is taken against the plaintiff's employee and taxi driver on February 24, 2012, which employs about 150 full-time workers in the part of the intervenor's business. (1) The grounds for disciplinary action against the worker and taxi driver on June 12, 2003 (hereinafter "the dismissal of this case") (hereinafter "the dismissal of this case") ① The act of violence with the relevant personnel and criminal punishment following such act. (2) The act of traffic accident such as the submission of a statement about absence from office. (3) The act of refusing to report the traffic accident. (4) The act of violating the organization order and deceptive order (hereinafter "the act of misconduct in this case." If it is individually referred to as "the act of misconduct in this case." The grounds for dismissal of the plaintiff's request for remedy against the violation in this case, the disciplinary procedure is legitimate, and the remaining part of the disciplinary action of this case, including the assault in this case.
Any disciplinary action shall also be appropriate.
No violation of disciplinary procedure shall be committed.
- The part concerning unfair labor practices: The dismissal and refusal of assignment in the instant case do not constitute unfair labor practices dealing with disadvantages, and the suspension of deduction of union expenses and the failure to apply the system of separate payment shall not be subject to adjudication as it constitutes a ground for rejection of an application pursuant to Article 60(1)5 of the Labor Relations Commission Regulations. There is no dispute over grounds for recognition, and the purport of the entire arguments and arguments.
2. Of the instant decision rendered by the reexamination, whether the relevant dismissal was lawful or not.