Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the president of the D cafeteria located in C 13th in the East Sea, and the victim E (name, leisure, age 22) and victim F (age 22) are employees in the above D cafeteria.

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes against Victims E (or by force, etc. on duty);

A. On May 1, 2017, the Defendant committed an indecent act against the victim by putting the victim E on duty at the above D restaurant, putting the victim’s hand in the Defendant’s hand, putting the victim’s hand in the Defendant’s hand, putting the victim’s hand in the Defendant’s body without refusing to reject it due to an employment relationship, and putting the victim’s hand in the Defendant’s body, putting the victim’s hand into the Defendant’s body, putting the victim’s knife knife knife with the victim’s knife with the victim’s knife, following the victim’s knife.

B. On July 6, 2017, at H located in the second floor of G Building at the same time, the Defendant, at around 23:00 on July 6, 2017, committed an indecent act by force on business by having the victim E with his own dancing, and by having the victim knife with knife with knife with knife with knife with knife with knife with knife with knife with knife’s hand.

2. A violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes against the Victims F of the Victim F (compact by force, etc.) at around 14:00 on May 2017, the Defendant reported that the damaged person who agreed to do so would have a food distribution to the victim F of the ordinary cafeteria, “on the part of the victim F of the ordinary boys, it is not bad to the inside, and the width is not limited,” and “on the other hand, if the inside is more young, it would have come to the inside,” and “on the other hand, it would be the same that the victim would have taken a sexual speech with the plenaryty bank.” The Defendant reported that the damaged person who agreed to do so would have a food distribution to the victim for the same month only, and that the victim walk can have a food distribution to the victim.