logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2013.06.20 2012고단2662
부정수표단속법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Of the instant facts charged, the check number “B,” “C,” “D,” “E,” and “F”.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From February 1, 1997, the Defendant entered into a check contract with the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Rural Affairs and entered into a check contract with the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries in the name of the Defendant and entered into a check contract with the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries.

1. Around December 2, 2011, the Defendant issued one check number “N”, face value “30,000,000,” and one check number per unit of the bank in the name of the Defendant, which is “N”, “30,000,000,” and the date of issuance,” in the M office operated by the Defendant in the following cities:

On July 5, 2012, the holder of the check presented the check payment system to the Bank.

However, the defendant did not receive the suspension of transaction.

2. On March 23, 2012, the Defendant issued one check number “O”, face value “30,000,000”, and one check number per bank under the name of the Defendant, which is the date of issuance “ October 10, 2012.”

The holder of the check presented that the check shall pay the check to the bank within the period of presentment for payment.

However, the defendant did not receive the suspension of transaction.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each written accusation (the 1st page, No. 37, No. 21 of the Investigation Records);

1. Investigation report (Investigation of P phone for Witnesses);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (the final holder of a check);

1. Article 2 (2) and (1) of the Control of Illegal Check Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 2 (2) and (1) of the Act on the Control of Illegal Check which enables

1. Of concurrent crimes, the part concerning the dismissal of prosecution pursuant to the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. From February 1, 1997, the Defendant entered into a check contract with the NAFT Central Branch of the NAF and entered into a check contract under the name of the Defendant from February 1, 1997.

On November 29, 2011, the Defendant issued one check number B, face value “30,000,000”, and one check number per bank under the name of the Defendant, which is “R” office located in Seo-gu Q, Daegu, and the date of issuance.”

On July 20, 2012, the holder of the check presented the check for payment within the period for presentment of payment.

However, the defendant.

arrow