A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

On April 18, 2013, the Defendant entered into a contract for current account transaction in the name of the Daegu Bank and a stock company B and entered into a check transaction.

On September 6, 2013, the Defendant issued one check number “E”, “E” on the date of issuance, and “12,000,000 won per unit of the check number” to D Company B office operated by the Defendant in Seogu-gu, Daegu-gu.

On January 29, 2014, the holder of the check presented a payment proposal to the bank.

However, the defendant did not receive the suspension of transaction.

Accordingly, the Defendant issued the check of KRW 361,260,318 in total, as indicated in the attached Table Nos. 1 through 14, 16, 17, and 18 from around that time to January 6, 2014, including that the Defendant did not receive the payment on the date of presentation due to transaction politics after issuing the check, but did not receive the payment as a disposition of transaction suspension.

On April 18, 2013, the Defendant entered into a contract for current account transaction with the Daegu Bank's branch on April 18, 2013 and entered into a check transaction.

On November 15, 2013, the Defendant issued a check number to F companies as the purchase price for salt manufacturing, a check number "G", "date of issuance", and "53,069,500 won per unit of right" to F companies at the offices in Seo-gu, Daegu Metropolitan City.

On April 7, 2014, the holder of the check presented payment proposal to the Bank.

However, the defendant did not receive the suspension of transaction.

Summary of Evidence

"2014 Highest 362"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each accusation letter "2014 Highest 561";

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the charge book and a copy of the number of shares;

1. Article 2 (2) and (1) of the Control of Illegal Check Control Act and the selection of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act are insolvent.