logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2013.12.24 2013고정584
부정수표단속법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From February 23, 1995, the Defendant entered into a check contract with the Nonghyup Bank as the original main day and the Defendant from February 23, 1995, and has traded the check number per unit.

1. On March 20, 2013, the Defendant’s “C” office located in “C” as of March 20, 2013, indicated in the facts charged in the amount of the check “3,90,000 won” is obvious that the Defendant is a clerical error.

(See No. 1 of the Evidence List). A copy of the number of units of the above bank was issued in the name of the accused.

On June 20, 2013, the holder of the check presented the payment order to the above bank on June 20, 2013.

However, the defendant did not receive the suspension of transaction.

2. On February 28, 2013, the Defendant issued a check number “E”, the date of issuance “E”, and the check amount “4,000,000 won” in the name of the Defendant in the office of Paragraph (1) of the same Article.

On May 28, 2013, the holder of the check presented the check payment system within the time limit for presentment for payment.

However, the defendant did not pay for the shortage of deposit.

3. On February 25, 2013, at the office of Paragraph (1) of the same Article, the Defendant issued a check number “F”, the issue date “F, May 25, 2013”, and the check amount “3,500,000 won” in the name of the Defendant.

On May 27, 2013, the holder of the check presented the check payment system within the time limit for presentment for payment.

However, the defendant did not pay for the shortage of deposit.

4. On March 12, 2013, at the office of Paragraph (1) of the same Article, the Defendant issued one check number per unit of the said bank in the name of the Defendant, which was named as “G number,” “G date, June 12, 2013,” “3,750,000 won of the check amount,” respectively.

On June 12, 2013, the holder of the check presented the check payment system within the time limit for presentment for payment.

However, the defendant did not receive the suspension of transaction.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The sequence 1 of the evidence list in each accusation;

arrow