1. The defendant shall deliver to the plaintiff the real estate stated in the attached Form.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

3.Paragraph 1.

1. The Sungnam-gu Mayor: (a) designated the Plaintiff as the implementer of the rearrangement project for housing redevelopment (hereinafter “instant rearrangement project”); (b) authorized the instant rearrangement project on November 7, 2016; and (c) publicly announced the instant management and disposal plan on the same day; (b) at the time the Defendant owned real estate located in the instant rearrangement project zone; (c) the Central Land Expropriation Committee, on February 8, 2018, determined the amount of compensation for the real estate indicated in the attached Form on March 28, 2018, determined the date of expropriation (hereinafter “instant expropriation”); and (d) on March 20, 2018, the Plaintiff deposited compensation for the Defendant on March 20, 2018, pursuant to the evidence and evidence Nos. 25 and evidence No. 36, and evidence No. 36, and evidence No. 5, and evidence No. 5, No. 2016, No. 2016, Mar. 24, 2018.

According to the above facts, the plaintiff not only acquired the right to use and benefit from the project operator of this case but also acquired the ownership due to the expropriation of the attached real estate and completed the deposit of compensation for the defendant's expropriation for the defendant. Thus, the defendant is obligated to deliver the real estate in the attached Form possessed by the defendant to the plaintiff

2. As to the determination of the Defendant’s assertion, the Defendant alleged that the Defendant operated the furniture store for 30 years from the real estate indicated in the attached Form, but did not compensate for business losses, and thus, the Defendant cannot deliver the real estate indicated in the attached Form. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge the Defendant’

3. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.