(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2013.09.10 2013고정213

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2013.09.10 2013고정213

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)등

Text

Defendant

B The Defendant A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,00,000, and a fine of KRW 500,000, respectively.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B around 02:00 on November 21, 2012, the victim G (the 22 years of age) with female-friendly job offering F was drunk in front of the E main shop located in Haju-si, and the victim H (the 22 years of age) was fighting with the victim's body, such as the victim's h (the Habbbbbbing site due to the bucking of the victim's G, the victim's h (the 22 years of age), the victim's h's body was flick, the victim's h's body was flick, the victim's body was flick, the victim's body was flick.

After diving, the Defendants followed the victims from the long-term park to the long-term park, followed by the victims, and carried out physical fightings with the victims.

As a result, the Defendants jointly committed violence to the victim H, and committed violence to the victim G for about three weeks, and committed violence to the right side of the victim G.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of witness G and H;

1. The application of the police statement to F and the Act and subordinate statutes (No. 5 of the evidence list);

1. Relevant Article 2 (2) and (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of joint injury and the selection of fines), Article 2 (2) and (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of joint violence and the selection of fines)

1. Defendants from among concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act; and

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. The defendants of the provisional payment order asserts that the defense counsel's assertion of the defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendants' physical size is a passive resistance to escape from violence of the victims, and thus, it does not constitute a legitimate act.

However, the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court is recognized as a whole.

참조조문

-폭력행위 등 처벌에 관한 법률 제2조 제2항

유사 판례

-서울서부지방법원 2014.09.02 2014고합177

-대전지방법원 2014.02.13 2014고정110

-서울남부지방법원 2013.04.25 2012고단4121

-수원지방법원 2013.11.27 2013고단3830

-인천지방법원 2015.06.17 2014고단9181