logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.03.18 2015고정263
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 4, 2006, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Seoul Central District Court (Seoul Central District Court) issued a summary order of KRW 700,000 as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving). On June 27, 2008, the Seoul Northern District Court issued a summary order of KRW 2 million as a crime of the same offense at the Seoul Northern District Court (hereinafter “Seoul Northern District Court”) on two occasions, but on October 4, 2014, the Defendant was punished for driving under the influence of alcohol, such as receiving a summary order of KRW 2 million. However, on around 23:05, around 173:05, the Defendant was driving a e250-benz under the influence of alcohol level from approximately 100 meters to 675 E-250-benz under the influence of alcohol level of KRW 0.164% under the influence of alcohol level from March 4, 2014.

2. As stated in the above paragraph (1), the Defendant: (a) asked C to state that she had her woman-friendly appearance C had a drunk drive; and (b) let C make a false confession.

Thus, on October 19, 2014, at around 14:21, 201, the Defendant, at the office of the Gangnam-gu Seoul Northern Police Station Security Service and the Transport Investigation Team, made a false statement that his/her female was under the influence of alcohol and had a person who committed a crime subject to a fine or heavier punishment, in order to allow C to escape.

Summary of Evidence

1. An interrogation protocol of the police against the accused (three times);

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of C and E;

1. E statements;

1. Notification of the results of the crackdown on drunk driving, report on the situation of drunk driving, and inquiry into the results of the crackdown on drunk driving;

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal records and investigation reports (attached to previous records and a copy of the summary order);

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, Articles 151 (1) and 31 of the Criminal Act, the choice of fines for the crimes, the choice of penalties, and the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Detention at a workhouse;

arrow