logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2014.08.19 2014고단1655
무고
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around June 2013, the Defendant became aware of C in the Internet car page “A” and became aware of C, and became aware of her sexual intercourse under the agreement. However, from October 2013 to October 2013, C was not exposed to telephone, and was refused to engage in a gift investigation.

On February 26, 2014, at around 22:00, the Defendant reported to the public service center of the Gangseo-gu Seoul Northern Police Station located in 406, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, the Defendant reported to the police officer in charge of the fire-fighting “at the house of the Defendant at around October to November 2013, 2013, the Defendant was raped against the Defendant,” and at the office of the Nowon-gu Police Station at around 23:30 of the same day, the Defendant prepared and submitted to the police officer in charge of sexual assault victim support center in Nowon-gu, Seoul, Nowon-gu, Seoul, the Nowon Police Station at the Nowon-gu, Nowon-gu, Seoul., the Defendant stated to the police officer D that “The Defendant was forced to go alcohol at the house of the Defendant on November 2013, and thus punished because the Defendant was raped by force.”

However, the facts were that the defendant and the defendant C had a mutual defense and had a sexual intercourse under the agreement.

As a result, the defendant was arrested for the purpose of having C receive criminal punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the petition for complaint and the petition for cancellation;

1. Article 156 of the Criminal Act and Article 156 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not have any previous conviction for the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Provisional Payment Order; the defendant immediately withdraws from the complaint after the complaint; the defendant has mental capacity such as depression; the complaint in this case also appears to be related thereto; and the confession of the crime in this case and its depth are against the order shall be determined by taking into account the following factors:

arrow