Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A, even though it is aware that lending is impossible in a normal way, A would request D, etc. to provide a false tenant with a loan, and Defendant B would act as a false landlord, and Defendant D and E conspired to act as a forgery of a certificate of employment, payment statement, etc. in the name of the relevant business entity in order to disguise that false lessees actually work as a worker.

Defendant

A around April 29, 2014, at the Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, and the first floor G Licensed Real Estate Agent Office, prepared a false lease agreement with Defendant B and the victim's national bank located in the same Gu as the deposit amount of KRW 60,000,00,000, at the south-dong branch of the victim's national bank located in the same Gu around the 30th day of the same month, submitted a forged employment certificate and the above false lease agreement as D and E were employed in Company I, and applied for a "house lease loan".

5.2.Around February, 200, Defendant B received a delivery of KRW 40 million as a loan for a deposit under the name of a deposit for a deposit for a deposit under the name of J community credit cooperatives (K).

Accordingly, the Defendants received property in collusion with D and E.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant A by the police;

1. Each police interrogation protocol on L, D, L, M, E, N,O, or P;

1. Application of postal records, loan documents-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. In light of the relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 347(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts and the selection of punishment, the amount obtained by deceiving the reason for sentencing each of the sentencing of imprisonment is up to 40 million won, the nature of the crime is not good in light of the methods of the crime, and there is no agreement, and Defendant A has been subject to criminal punishment over five times (including once a real-time punishment). Defendant B has not only been sentenced to punishment for attempted murder but also has a record of criminal punishment for six years, including that he/she has been punished for attempted murder, and that he/she has a record of being punished for the same kind of crime, it shall be considered as a favorable circumstance.