logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.07.06 2018노1536
상해등
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. 1) Fact-misunderstanding 2017 Godan 9236 business obstruction case was found to be by the Defendant to agree on the case 2017 Godan 8357, but Y was difficult for the Defendant to w to w to w to w to w to w to w to w to w to w to w to w to w to w to w to w to w to w to w to w to w

2) In the case of interference with the business affairs 2017 Godan 9632, the Defendant was merely a higher arbitrative with the president who was next to the Defendant’s order to verify the terms of the agreement, and did not exercise its power.

B. The sentence sentenced by the lower court against the Defendant (one hundred months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below regarding the assertion of mistake of fact: ① The victims of interference with each of the instant operations did not pay the exorbit value at the singing shop operated by the victims prior to the crime of interference with the instant operations and reported it to the police; and thereafter, the Defendant visited the victims again in connection with the instant issue and thereby committed the crime of interference with each of the instant operations.

A statement is made; ② The police officers who received 112 reports were dispatched to the site of the instant case, and the Defendant’s abusive and disturbance continued to have been committed, and the arrest of the police officers on the day of the instant case repeatedly took place despite the police officers’ clothes, and ③ the Defendant, even though the main text points of the instant case were put to the agreement on the prior case, intending to take the Defendant’s bath and see the Defendant.

However, in the case of the 2017 Highest 9236 case, the time of crime began to prevent singing stores from running 19:50 times, and it is difficult for the victim to have a disturbing act as alleged by the defendant in the case of the 2017 Highest 2017 Highest 9236 case.

arrow