1. The judgment of the first instance court is modified according to the selection of the appointed parties at the trial court as follows.

2. The defendant, as well as a family.

1. The reasons for the court's explanation of this case by the court of first instance are as follows: (a) according to the party's selection at the court of first instance, "Plaintiff A" in the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed "Plaintiff B"; (b) "Plaintiff B" shall be deemed "Appointed B"; and "Plaintiffs" shall be deemed "Plaintiff and Selection B"; and (c) No. 5, "No. 1 through No. 11" (including each number, if any) shall be deemed as "Evidence submitted by the defendant alone"; and (d) except that the evidence submitted by the defendant shall be deemed as the reasons for the judgment of first instance. Thus, they shall be cited pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff and the designated parties B's claims against the defendant are accepted on the grounds of all of them. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, the defendant's appeal shall be dismissed as it is without merit. However, since the joint plaintiffs of the first instance in the trial appointed the plaintiff as the designated party, the judgment of the court of first instance shall be modified, and it is so decided as per Disposition.