1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

3.The appointment of the parties at the trial.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the following additional judgments to the last conclusion of the judgment of the court of first instance, and therefore, it is also acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The defendant alleged in the trial that the defendant completed the registration of transfer of ownership as to cemetery usage right or apartment bond 1 (No. 103 Dong-dong 103, Dong-dong 103) owned by the defendant for the repayment of obligations under the instant conciliation protocol, but there is no evidence to acknowledge it (the plaintiff is merely the above assertion in the trial, and no evidence is submitted). The defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. The conclusion is that the claims of the plaintiff (appointed party) and the appointed party against the defendant are all reasonable, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and the joint plaintiffs of first instance appointed A as the appointed party, and it is decided to modify the judgment of the court of first instance. It is so decided as per Disposition.