1. The judgment of the first instance court shall be modified according to the selection of the appointed parties in the trial as follows.

1. The reasoning of the court of first instance’s explanation as to this case is as follows: (a) except where the court of first instance appoints “Plaintiffs” in the judgment of the court of first instance according to the selection of the appointed party at the court of first instance as “Plaintiffs and designated parties” is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance; and (b) thus, it is acceptable as it is

2. Thus, the claim of this case by the plaintiff and the designated parties shall be dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and all appeals by the plaintiff and the designated parties shall be dismissed as it is without merit. However, the appeal by the plaintiff and the designated parties shall be dismissed as it is modified as the judgment of the court of first instance instead of dismissing the appeal by the plaintiff and the designated parties according to the selection of the