logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2017.01.11 2016나293
사정재판에 대한 이의의 소
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: the first instance court's 7th, 8th, 12, 13, 20, 9th, 1, 3, and 6th "seafarers" of the first instance court's 7th, 9th, 3, and 6th, 100 fishing vessel's 2th, 9th, 3, and 6th, 3th, 100, 1000, 1000, 100, 1000, 1000, 1000, 2000, 1000, 1000, 1000, 1000, 1000, 100,0000, 100,0000,000 won of the first instance court's judgment and 10,000,000 won of the first instance court's 2th, 2007.

[Supplementary part] [Article 10-6 to 12] Plaintiff B claimed that Plaintiff B entered into an employment contract with EN, the representative of fishing vessels, and worked for EO partnership corporations, and processed or repaired the destroyed goods caught by EM while working for EO partnership corporations.

However, EM.

arrow