(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.04.04 2016누72312

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.04.04 2016누72312

국가유공자 및 보훈보상자 유족등록거부처분취소

Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following parts to be filled or added. Thus, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Part 2 of the 14th judgment of the court of first instance, the term "this court" shall be added to "Uwon District Court".

B. Part II of the judgment of the first instance added “the first instance court” in front of “V”. Part VIII of the judgment of the first instance added “the fact-finding inquiry at the third instance.” Part XIV of the judgment of the first instance to “the fact-finding at the fourth instance.” Part IX of the judgment of the first instance added the following: (d) the deceased was hospitalized in the emergency room of the police hospital two times due to the merger of urine disease on February 1, 2009 and April 7, 2009; (b) the period from March 2, 2009: (c) the police hospital was hospitalized into the insurinary urine-Jinsurinary urine urine disease accompanied by a certificate of merger with the public urine in the police hospital; and (d) the head of the police station added “the first instance court number to “the first instance court number to 10 to 13” and “the first instance court number to 13” to “the first instance court number to 13”.

F. Under the 13th page of the judgment of the first instance, each of the “G sentry” provided for in the 7th, 2, and 1 shall be deemed to be “C sentry.”

G. From 14th to 10th of the judgment of the court of first instance, the following shall be followed:

Although the deceased was diagnosed as a Madne Span disease before he was on duty in C, in light of the health and physical conditions of the deceased, it appears that the deceased had been on duty and stressed rapidly above the natural progress rate, and thus, part of the opinion of the above medical record appraisal is between the deceased’s performance of duties and the Madne disease of the horse.

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

-행정소송법 제8조 제2항

유사 판례

-춘천지방법원강릉지원 2020.09.22 2020나30320

-서울고등법원 2018.11.20 2018누58709

-서울고등법원 2017.03.07 2016누36118

-서울고등법원 2018.01.30 2017누73886

-서울고등법원 2018.05.15 2018누30978