logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.11.29 2016고단6559
공문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, at the time of working in a trade company, knew of the personal information such as the victim C's resident registration number, etc. as the business owner of the agency at the time of the defendant's working in the trade company, thought that the victim left the Republic of Korea through the name of another victim.

1. On September 2012, at the planning real estate office located in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter referred to as Songpa-gu), the Defendant forged a copy of the resident registration certificate for C in the name of “C” in the name column of the Defendant’s wife D’s resident registration number at the time of being kept, and in the resident registration number column, “E” as the resident registration number of C, which is the official document for the purpose of exercising it by copying it.

2. On February 19, 2012, the Defendant: (a) requested G, who is a son of F, to open one mobile phone in the name of G, and exercised the forged official document by facsimile as if a copy of the resident registration certificate, which is a forged official document, was issued genuinely, as described in paragraph (1).

3. On September 19, 2012, the Defendant forged private document: (a) in the office described in paragraph (1) around September 19, 2012, the Defendant contacted G who worked as an employee at a mobile phone agency with G; and (b) even though the Defendant did not have been authorized by C to open a mobile phone in the name of C, as if the Defendant was delegated with the authority to open a mobile phone in the name of C, by facsimile the copy of the resident registration certificate of the forged C, as described in paragraph (1), and by requesting G who knows the fact, to open a mobile phone in the name of C; (c) made G enter “C”, “E”, “E”, and “C” in the resident registration number column; and (d) made the applicant column sign “C” and forged one application form for mobile phone entry in the name of C, which is a private document concerning rights and duties,

4. The Defendant on September 2, 2012 in the event of a superior investigative document.

arrow