All of the first and second original judgments shall be reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

The defendant above.

1. Summary of the facts charged in this case

A. A. On June 5, 2013, the summary of the facts charged in the case of 2014No1308, defamation Defendant had no fact that the victim D, the head of the above apartment management office, intended to close down the above apartment building and caused the elderly households by various conspiracys and intimidation. Despite the fact that there was no fact that there was any encouragement of conflict among the residents by imposing the management expenses by fraud, the head of the Si headquarters and the head of the management office D, the representative F church pastor D, the head of the Dong office D, and the head of the Gu branch of the management office, had the elderly household move up for various conspiracys and intimidation by having the elderly to close the old. It imposed and imposed the management expenses excessively or fraud and imposed conflicts among the residents, thereby impairing the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts by openly posting and posting a substitute report stating that “The victim D, who is the head of the above apartment management office, would have been in conflict with

B. On February 6, 2014, the Defendant’s insultd the victim D who is the head of the above apartment management office in a way of openly distributing the said apartment management office by entering the said apartment management office into “party of our apartment house corruption” in a way of selling by mail the printed matter to the occupants of the above apartment 120, or distributing the house visits to each household.

B. On February 12, 2014, around 18:30 on February 12, 2014, the Defendant expressed the victim’s H that the Defendant passed the management office while talking about the apartment operation along with head of the Tong I, and expressed the victim’s hysium with the view that the elderly citizens, such as I, J, and the elderly president, are heard.

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

2. Summary of the grounds for appeal and the judgment of each court below

A. Summary of grounds for appeal

⑴. 사실오인 내지 법리오해 ㈎ 제1원심판결에 대하여 피고인이 이 사건 공소사실의 각 행위 자체를 한 것은 사실이다.

However, all the charges are charged.