logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2012. 09. 13. 선고 2012두11539 판결
(심리불속행) 실제 소유하고 있는 주식이라고 판단되므로 명의신탁에 따른 증여세 과세는 위법함[국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2011Nu36533 (2012.05.02)

Case Number of the previous trial

early 209west342 ( December 01, 2010)

Title

Since it is judged that shares are actually owned, gift tax under title trust is illegal.

Summary

(Summary) Even after the occurrence of a dispute over ownership, it is not sufficient to recognize that a title trust was made with respect to the payment of dividends by shares after the occurrence of a dispute over ownership, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Cases

2012Du11539 Revocation of a disposition, etc. imposing gift tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

X 2 others

Defendant-Appellee

The Director of Gangnam District Office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2011Nu36533 Decided May 2, 2012

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the argument on the grounds of appeal by the appellant falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal, and therefore, all of the appeals are dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per

Reference materials.

If the grounds for final appeal are not included in the grounds of appeal that make it appropriate for the court of final appeal to become a legal trial, such as matters concerning significant violation of Acts and subordinate statutes, etc., the system of final appeal will not continue to proceed with the deliberation on the merits of the grounds for final appeal, but will not proceed with the deliberation on the merits of the grounds for final

arrow