logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2011. 05. 26. 선고 2011두5018 판결
(심리불속행) 경매로 건물을 소유권을 취득하였다가 매도한 것이므로 증여세 부과처분은 위법함[국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2010Nu29866 (Law No. 2011, 2011)

Case Number of the previous trial

early 2008west0803 (Ob. 19, 2008)

Title

Since the building was acquired and sold by auction, the imposition of gift tax is illegal.

Summary

(C) The disposition of gift tax on the premise that the third party, as the actual owner, donated the difference in the purchase price of the building part to the plaintiffs is unlawful.

Cases

2011Du5018 Revocation of Disposition of Imposition of Gift Tax

Plaintiff-Appellee

1.GA2.B3.GCC

Defendant-Appellant

○ Head of tax office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2010Nu29866 Decided January 20, 201

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the assertion on the grounds of appeal by the appellant falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal and therefore, all of the appeals are dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per

Reference materials.

If the grounds of final appeal are not included in the grounds of final appeal that make it appropriate for the court of final appeal to become a legal trial, such as matters concerning significant violation of Acts and subordinate statutes, etc., the system of trial without continuing the deliberation on the merits of the grounds of final appeal, and refers to the system of dismissal of final appeal by judgment without continuing the deliberation on the merits of the grounds of final appeal (see this case, e.g.,

arrow