beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. Defendant A shall pay KRW 180,525,66 and KRW 87,061,383 among them from October 14, 2014 to the date of full payment.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. A. A credit union loaned 18% per annum on January 29, 199 to Defendant A at an interest rate of 11,530,000 won per annum, 25% per annum on delay, and on January 29, 2001 on redemption date (hereinafter “instant claim”) (hereinafter “instant claim”) and on September 30, 200, 37.6% per annum on the joint and several surety surety H of the network H at an interest rate of 13.5% per annum, 22% per annum on delay, and 37.6% per annum on September 30, 200, and each of the instant claims was assigned to the Plaintiff on September 30, 202 (hereinafter “instant claim”) and each of the instant claims was assigned to the Plaintiff on February 22, 199, 15% per annum on delay, 222% per annum, and 36% per annum on repayment date.
In addition, on November 26, 2014, a copy of the complaint of this case, stating the transfer of each claim of this case, was served on Defendant A.
B. As of October 13, 2014, the balance of each of the instant claims is as follows, and the Plaintiff’s overdue interest rate of 17% per annum from June 21, 2013, the date following the date on which assets are finalized, shall apply.
Section B of this case’s claim No. 37,913,913, 7275,51,061,060 of this case’s claim No. 39,65,403 of this case’s claim No. 9,466,07 14,89,396 24,365,403 of this case’s claim No. 37,913,913, 77275,51,060 of this case’s claim No. 39,697,68840,651,651,651, 5158,640,649,203, 87,061,383,464,283 180,525,66
C. On August 20, 2008, the network H died with the Defendants, who are their children, as their bereaved family members. Defendant B, D, E, and F (hereinafter “Defendant B, etc.”) applied for qualified acceptance as the Jeonju District Court 2014Ra1179, and was tried on February 9, 2015.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, clear facts in record, Gap evidence 1-1, 2, 3, Gap evidence 2, 3, 4, Gap evidence 5-1, 2, Gap evidence 7, Eul evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings, and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. According to the facts found in the above determination as to the cause of the claim, the Defendants are liable to the net H’s obligations.