A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 20, 2017, from around 22:15 to 22:24 of the same day, the Defendant: (a) was subject to a noise complaint from the police officer, who was sent to the site by receiving a large amount of sound, and was notified of the violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act by the police officer, who was a police officer of the Chungcheongnam-gu Police Station D Police Station, who was a police officer of the Chungcheongnam-gu Police Station, called the site, and (b) was subject to the notification; (c) was subject to the notification to the head of the above E police officer; and (d) was subject to the notification; and (e) was fright, such as going on the patrol car; and (e) committed assault by the head of the above E police officer, who prevented him from taking

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of civil petitions by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. According to the reasoning of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, the sentence shall be determined as ordered by comprehensively taking into account all the conditions of the sentencing as shown in the records, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, and the circumstances before and after the instant crime.

The fact that the crime of this case is being committed is poor due to the fact that the police officer interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of the police officer.