logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2016. 06. 28. 선고 2016다214506 판결
(심리불속행) 이 사건 부동산은 종중소유로 보는 것이 타당함[국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Suwon District Court-2015-B-13499 (2.05, 2016)

Title

(A) It is reasonable to view the real estate of this case as the clan ownership.

Summary

(Summary of the Court) Since it is reasonable to regard the instant real estate as a clan property, the instant donation contract cannot be deemed as a fraudulent act.

Related statutes

Article 45 (Procedures for Seizing Real Estate)

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined. However, the grounds of appeal by the appellant are not included in the grounds prescribed in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, and the appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of

arrow