logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2018. 12. 28. 선고 2018다273394 판결
(심리불속행) 상속재산의 협의분할계약은 사해행위에 해당함.[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul East East District Court-2018-Na21571 (Law No. 29, 2018)

Title

(Incompetence of Trial) The agreement of division of inherited property constitutes a fraudulent act.

Summary

(C) If a delinquent taxpayer renounces his/her inherited property by division of inherited property, it can be viewed as a fraudulent act that reduces the joint security of general creditors.

Cases

2018Da273394 Revocation of Fraudulent Act

Plaintiff

Korea

Defendant

IsaA

Imposition of Judgment

December 28, 2018

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

Although all of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the appeal were examined, the argument on the grounds of appeal does not include the grounds provided for in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Trial Procedure, or does not have any reason. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of

arrow