The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

On December 15, 2015, at around 02:10, the Defendant used assault from D, E, F, G, H, and Si roads in front of C in Yasan-si B, Jeonju-si, and assaulted the victim E (17 years old) in response thereto.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. A report on the occurrence of a crime (finites that the defendant was not infinite of E head debt, but E was shaking of his head debt by the investigative agency;

However, in light of the fact that E does not seem to have any motive to make a false statement and the contents of the statement are mutually consistent, E’s statement may be trusted, and according to this, the facts charged in this case is found guilty).

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

1. Penalty fine of 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Sentence 59(1) [this case is a case in which a criminal investigation was initiated due to the police officer's recognition that five juveniles, such as D, are assaulting the Defendant and I, who called up after receiving a report of 112, driving the vehicle through one-way, such as D (the third page of the evidence record), and driving the vehicle through one-way, such as D, and driving the vehicle into one-way, and driving the vehicle into one-way, and driving the vehicle into one-way, and driving the vehicle into one-halfs. However, the Defendant and I seem to have been exposed to almost little unilaterally, compared to D's driving.

This point is supported not only by the statement of the parties to the case but also by the testimony of the J, diagnosis, etc. at the time of the testimony or examination (Article 8-11, 34 of the evidence record). Accordingly, this case focuses on the confirmation of suspicion D, etc. first, and during the investigation of E, the defendant is the head of the defendant.