The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds of appeal is that the court below convicted the defendant, on the ground that the defendant was unilaterally injured by the victim and his husband, and the defendant did not inflict any injury on the victim.

2. According to the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, the court below's determination of guilty of the facts charged in this case is just and acceptable, and there is an error of law by misunderstanding the facts as pointed out by the defendant, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

It does not appear.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

(1) A victim who sustained bodily injury from the defendant consistently through the following methods: from the stage of investigation to the court of original instance:

statement is made.

② Husband E of the victim also states to the effect that the Defendant was able to keep the victim’s head debt from the investigation stage to the court of the court of the court below consistent.

③ On the date of the occurrence of the instant case, the victim appears to have been treated at the hospital (47 pages of the evidence record), and knee, knee and elbel, etc. in the process of dispute between the Defendant and the Defendant (which means either 50 to 53 pages of the evidence record). As such, the Defendant’s appeal is without merit, and the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and is so decided as per Disposition. [Provided, That under Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, the “each investigation report of 1.1” in the summary of the evidence of the lower judgment ex officio pursuant to Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure is corrected to “1. Each investigation report