The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

On December 15, 2015, the Defendant assaulted victims, such as D, E, F, G, H, and Si roads, etc., on the street in front of Da, E, E, G, H, and Si roads in front of Yasan-gu, Jeonju-si, on one occasion at the right end of the victim H (17 years of age) and once at one time at the right end of the victim H (17 years of age), and assaulted victims, such as the shoulder part of the victim E (17 years of age) at one time at the end of the elbbow, and the shoulder part of the victim G (19 years of age) at one time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against H, E, or G;

1. Statement made to I by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on report of occurrence;

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

1. Penalty fine of 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Sentence 59(1) [this case is a case where a criminal investigation was initiated due to the police officer's recognition that five juveniles, such as D, are assaulted by the Defendant and J, and a police officer called out after receiving a report of 112, the investigation was initiated (the third page of the evidence record), and D, and the defendant and J went through the opposite side of the defendant and J, and they go through the opposite side of the case. While they go through the opposite of the defendant and the J, they go through the opposite of the opposite of the 10th two latter. On the other hand, the defendant and J seem to have been exposed to almost an unilateral assault compared to D's driving.

This point is supported not only by the statement of the party to the case but also by K’s photograph, diagnosis report, etc. at the time when the situation was observed (Article 8-11, 34 of the evidence record). Accordingly, this case focuses on the confirmation of the first suspicion of D, etc., and the investigation was conducted on the basis of this case. The defendant, who was investigated as a witness by the victim, made a statement that the victim was at the time of his/her entry into the victim and was investigated as a witness by the time of investigation.

(b).