logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.08.23 2019누30210
요양불승인처분취소
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. Acknowledgement of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the statement of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the following parts which are to be stated in this judgment, and thus, it shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Part 2, part 4, part 13 of the decision of the first instance court is "F", part 2 is "Plaintiffs", part 3 is "Plaintiffs", part 8, and part 6 are "Witnesss" in part 14, part 3 is "Witnesss of the first instance court", part 10, and part 11 are "timetime time of dispatch", part 4 is "Plaintiffs" in part 15, part 5 "C" in part 20, part 6 is "D", and part 11 is "reasonss".

Part 5 of the decision of the first instance shall add to the following:

3) The results of the inquiry and reply to L Hospital director – A. The increase in temporary blood pressure and blood transfusions occur when it is ordinarily hot materials, and if it exceeds the limit to which the body can cope with it, it may cause non-dynamic bodily damage, such as cardio-cerebrovascular diseases. If, on the date of the occurrence of the injury in the instant case, the deceased transferred weight equivalent to 24 km to a train, he/she lost his/her mind during his/her process of handling heavy weight, and due to the increase in temporary blood pressure and blood transfusions, etc., the deceased was caused during his/her process of handling heavy weight, and thereby, he/she is likely to act as a acute factor of the instant injury in the instant case, the following is added to Chapter 17 of the first instance judgment of the first instance court. In addition, according to the fact inquiry about the health of the deceased on the day of the instant accident, the testimony of the first instance court and the witness evidence No. 181 and the witness No. 11 of the instant case acknowledged as evidence No. G. 1.

arrow