The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The following facts are found: (a) the Defendant’s erroneous determination on the Defendant’s assertion of unfair sentencing is recognized; (b) there was no previous conviction except for the one-time fine due to the same crime; and (c) the Defendant was not arrested and the amount of profit actually acquired by the Defendant was not revealed. Although the crime of similar horse racing is recognized, it is necessary to strictly punish the Defendant as serious social harm, such as excessively encouraging the general public’s speculative spirit, impairing the sound sense of labor and failure in home economy, etc.; (c) in the act of similar horse racing in the case of this case organized, the Defendant recruited Mad purchaser and Mad’s name while recognizing the overall criminal process; and (d) inform them of the ID or password of the personal program, identification number, and certification number; and (e) share important acts to settle dividends according to the result of the horse racing after receiving the payment of imprisonment with the name of account under the Defendant’s management; (e) the period of crime is 2 years and 7 months; and (e) the motive and condition of the Defendant’s deposit in the account of this case before and after the Defendant’s deposit.

2. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since there is no reason to do so. It is so decided as per Disposition.