The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant asserted that, although he sublets his underground store that he leased and used, the above underground store was used as an illegal game room, it was later known that he had been used as an illegal game room. However, there was no evidence to support this. Rather, the Defendant used the above underground store as a game room, and the circumstances leading up to regulating the above D, which led to the Defendant’s subleting it to the above D. However, the Defendant, even if the investigative agency and the investigation agency set up the unemployment share to the trial, and the circumstances before and after the crime are very difficult.

In addition, the crime related to the use and provision of illegal game products and the operation of the illegal game room is highly likely to cause severe social harm, such as promoting a speculative spirit of the general public and causing failure in home economy, and there is a history that the defendant was punished while operating the illegal game room immediately before the judgment of the court below, there is no change of circumstances that can be considered in sentencing from the judgment of the court below to the judgment of the court below, and there is no other change of circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing in this case, such as the motive and background of the crime in this case, the defendant's age, character and behavior, and environment, the punishment imposed by the court below is too heavy

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.