The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (one year of imprisonment and confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. Although the defendant was subject to a disposition of suspension of indictment in 2006 for the same crime, he was sentenced to a fine in 2010, and was sentenced to a fine in 2010. The defendant committed the crime of this case over the nearest period of two years, which has reached a considerable amount of money due to the purchase price, etc. of private horse rights. The defendant's crime of this case is serious social harm, such as promoting the general public's spirit of gambling, impairing the sound sense of work and failure of home life, and thus, it is necessary to strictly punish the defendant. However, the defendant's mistake is recognized, and it seems that he is against depth while living in prison for five months after he was sentenced to a one-time suspension of indictment, and there is no other criminal history except for the above punishment as a fine, and that the defendant provided the so-called "a person who aided and aided by the defendant to be punished for the crime of this case," and that the defendant provided the so-called "a person who aided and aided by his occupation and behavior," and has been punished by the defendant.