beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Around July 15, 2011, the Defendant forged a copy of a sales contract in the name of G, which is a private document for rights and obligations, by allowing F to enter “Aphone32” in the cell phone information column in the form of the sales contract to use a device, which is a private document in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, in the form of a mobile phone information column in the form of the sales contract to use the device, and allowing F, who is an employee without any authority, to use the device without authority, to enter “Aphone32” in the unit, “96,000” in the unit column, “24” in the unit column, and “G” in the customer column.
Around that time, the Defendant forged an application for change of the device/story (USIM) in the name of G, which is a private document on rights and obligations, at the same place, and one copy of each written consent from the customer using the opon.
In addition, from August 1, 2010 to November 17, 2011, the Defendant forged Chapter 245 of the private document concerning the rights and obligations in the name of 31 persons over a total of 103 times, as shown in attached Table 1.
2. Around July 15, 2011, the Defendant: (a) had the aforementioned F enter into the “E” of the operation of the said Co., Ltd. D; (b) had him read the device set out in the name of G; (c) written application for change of the device/story (USIM); and (d) had the customer consent form connected to the computer to enter the image file into the quasi-information processing system installed in the Ecom; and (c) had the employee in charge of D Co., Ltd. and the employee in charge of Ecom, who did not know the forgery, sent the document as if the document were genuine, and had the employee look at the same on the computer screen; (d) exercised the sales contract for the device set up in the name of G; (e) the application for change of the device/story (USIM); and (e) the customer consent to use the phone.
In addition, the Defendant, from August 1, 2010 to November 17, 201, 31, 103 times over a total of 103 times, as shown in attached Table 1.